Volvo EX30 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Volvo EX30
$34,950
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Volvo EX30 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Volvo EX30 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Volvo EX30
Fuel Economy
Volvo EX30
Performance
Volvo EX30
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Volvo EX30
$34,950
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Volvo EX30 |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Volvo | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | EX30 | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | Ev | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $34,950 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $34,950 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $33,900 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | Twin Motor Performance AWD | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 422 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 400 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 3.4 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 109 MPGe combined | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | 253 miles EPA | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 69 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | 153 kW DC (10-80% in 26 min) | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.5 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.1 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.6 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Blistering acceleration in Twin Motor trim; Competitive starting price point; Sleek Scandinavian interior design; Google... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Limited rear legroom; Controls heavily centralized on touchscreen; Smaller cargo area compared to larger SUVs | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
