Rimac Nevera R vs Rimac Nevera R vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Rimac Nevera R
$2,500,000
Rimac Nevera R
€2,300,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Rimac Nevera R vs Rimac Nevera R vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Rimac Nevera R leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Rimac Nevera R
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Rimac Nevera R
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Rimac Nevera R
$2,500,000
Rating: 4.9/10
Rimac Nevera R
€2,300,000
Rating: 4.9/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Rimac Nevera R |
Rimac Nevera R |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Rimac | Rimac | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Nevera R | Nevera R | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — | — |
| Body Style | Coupe | Coupe | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $2,500,000 | €2,300,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $2,500,000 | €2,300,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $2,450,000 | €2,250,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | Quad-Motor Electric (Independent Permanent Magnet) | Quad-Motor Electric (Independent on each wheel) | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 2,107 hp | 2,107 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 1,740 lb-ft | 1,740 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 1.74 sec (0-60 mph) / 0-186 mph in 8.66 sec | 1.74 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 256 mph (electronically limited) | 256 mph | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A (Track-focused Hypercar) | N/A (Track Hypercar) | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Estimated 300 miles WLTP | Estimated ~300 miles WLTP | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | 0 g/mi | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 120 kWh | 120 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | Up to 500 kW DC | Up to 500 kW DC | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.9/10 | 4.9/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 10.0 | 10.0 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.0 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.8 | 9.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.2 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Staggering 2,107 horsepower output; Exceptional cornering agility with R-AWTV; Enhanced aerodynamic downforce; Upgraded... | Astounding 2,107 horsepower output; Mind-blowing 0-60 mph time of 1.74 seconds; Advanced R-AWTV torque vectoring system;... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Extremely limited production run; Multi-million dollar price tag; High insurance and maintenance costs | Extremely limited production run; Multi-million dollar price tag; Firm ride quality optimized exclusively for track and... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
