Rimac Nevera R vs Rimac Nevera R vs Toyota RAV4
Rimac Nevera R
$2,500,000
Rimac Nevera R
€2,300,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Rimac Nevera R vs Rimac Nevera R vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Rimac Nevera R leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Rimac Nevera R
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Rimac Nevera R
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Rimac Nevera R
$2,500,000
Rating: 4.9/10
Rimac Nevera R
€2,300,000
Rating: 4.9/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Rimac Nevera R |
Rimac Nevera R |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Rimac | Rimac | Toyota |
| Model | Nevera R | Nevera R | RAV4 |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Coupe | Coupe | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $2,500,000 | €2,300,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $2,500,000 | €2,300,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $2,450,000 | €2,250,000 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Quad-Motor Electric (Independent Permanent Magnet) | Quad-Motor Electric (Independent on each wheel) | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 2,107 hp | 2,107 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 1,740 lb-ft | 1,740 lb-ft | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 1.74 sec (0-60 mph) / 0-186 mph in 8.66 sec | 1.74 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 256 mph (electronically limited) | 256 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A (Track-focused Hypercar) | N/A (Track Hypercar) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | Estimated 300 miles WLTP | Estimated ~300 miles WLTP | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | 0 g/mi | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 120 kWh | 120 kWh | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Up to 500 kW DC | Up to 500 kW DC | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.9/10 | 4.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 10.0 | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.0 | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.8 | 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.2 | 7.5 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Staggering 2,107 horsepower output; Exceptional cornering agility with R-AWTV; Enhanced aerodynamic downforce; Upgraded... | Astounding 2,107 horsepower output; Mind-blowing 0-60 mph time of 1.74 seconds; Advanced R-AWTV torque vectoring system;... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Extremely limited production run; Multi-million dollar price tag; High insurance and maintenance costs | Extremely limited production run; Multi-million dollar price tag; Firm ride quality optimized exclusively for track and... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
