Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€38,900 – €39,500
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€39,500 – €40,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Lancia Ypsilon HF
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€38,900 – €39,500
Rating: 4.6/10
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€39,500 – €40,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Lancia Ypsilon HF |
Lancia Ypsilon HF |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Lancia | Lancia | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Ypsilon HF | Ypsilon HF | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — | — |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | €38,900 – €39,500 | €39,500 – €40,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | €39,500 | €40,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | €37,900 | €38,500 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | Single Electric Motor | Single Electric Motor | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 345 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.8 sec (0-100 km/h) | 5.6 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | Approx. 400 km WLTP | N/A | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | 400 km WLTP | 400 km WLTP | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/km | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 54 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | 100 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min) | 100 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min) | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.2 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 8.5 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.5 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Potent 280 hp electric motor; Aggressive hot hatch styling with iconic HF logo; Sharp handling with widened track and lo... | Potent 280 hp electric motor; Mechanical limited-slip differential for enhanced grip; Striking and aggressive exterior s... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Limited rear headroom; 100 kW charging speed trails class leaders; Niche brand availability | Limited to front-wheel drive layout; DC charging capped at 100 kW; Niche market availability across Europe; Firm ride qu... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
