Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Toyota RAV4
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€38,900 – €39,500
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€39,500 – €40,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Lancia Ypsilon HF vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Lancia Ypsilon HF
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€38,900 – €39,500
Rating: 4.6/10
Lancia Ypsilon HF
€39,500 – €40,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Lancia Ypsilon HF |
Lancia Ypsilon HF |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Lancia | Lancia | Toyota |
| Model | Ypsilon HF | Ypsilon HF | RAV4 |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | €38,900 – €39,500 | €39,500 – €40,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | €39,500 | €40,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | €37,900 | €38,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Single Electric Motor | Single Electric Motor | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 345 Nm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.8 sec (0-100 km/h) | 5.6 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | Approx. 400 km WLTP | N/A | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 400 km WLTP | 400 km WLTP | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/km | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 54 kWh | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | 100 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min) | 100 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min) | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.2 | 8.0 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.5 | 8.4 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Potent 280 hp electric motor; Aggressive hot hatch styling with iconic HF logo; Sharp handling with widened track and lo... | Potent 280 hp electric motor; Mechanical limited-slip differential for enhanced grip; Striking and aggressive exterior s... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Limited rear headroom; 100 kW charging speed trails class leaders; Niche brand availability | Limited to front-wheel drive layout; DC charging capped at 100 kW; Niche market availability across Europe; Firm ride qu... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
