GMC Yukon vs Toyota RAV4
GMC Yukon
$103,300
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing GMC Yukon vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. GMC Yukon leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
GMC Yukon
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
GMC Yukon
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
GMC Yukon
$103,300
Rating: 4.9/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
GMC Yukon |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | GMC | Toyota |
| Model | Yukon | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $103,300 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $103,300 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $101,200 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 6.2L EcoTec3 V8 with Dynamic Fuel Management & VVT | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 420 hp @ 5,600 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 460 lb-ft @ 4,100 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.9 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 16 MPG Combined (14 City / 18 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V heavy-duty maintenance-free battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1350 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick+ | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Powerful 420 hp 6.2L EcoTec3 V8 with smooth 10-speed transmission; Air Ride Adaptive Suspension combined with Magnetic R... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Fuel economy is low at 16 MPG combined and requires premium gasoline; Large body dimensions and 24-inch wheels require c... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
