GMC Yukon vs Tesla Model Y
GMC Yukon
$103,300
Tesla Model Y
$47,990 – $48,990
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing GMC Yukon vs Tesla Model Y. Tesla Model Y offers the strongest value on price. GMC Yukon leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
GMC Yukon
Best Value
Tesla Model Y
Fuel Economy
Tesla Model Y
Performance
GMC Yukon
Tesla Model Y
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
GMC Yukon
$103,300
Rating: 4.9/10
Tesla Model Y
$47,990 – $48,990
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
GMC Yukon |
Tesla Model Y |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | GMC | Tesla |
| Model | Yukon | Model Y |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Ev |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $103,300 | $47,990 – $48,990 |
| MSRP | $103,300 | $48,990 |
| Dealer Price | $101,200 | $47,990 |
| Engine | 6.2L EcoTec3 V8 with Dynamic Fuel Management & VVT | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 420 hp @ 5,600 rpm | 384 hp (est.) |
| Torque | 460 lb-ft @ 4,100 rpm | Instant electric torque |
| 0–60 mph | 5.9 sec (0-60 mph) | 4.6 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 135 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | 16 MPG Combined (14 City / 18 Hwy) | 117 MPGe combined (EPA est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | 330 miles EPA (Long Range AWD est.) |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | 0 g/mi |
| Battery | 12V heavy-duty maintenance-free battery | Approx. 75 kWh (usable, est.) |
| Charging | N/A | 250 kW DC peak (Supercharger V3) |
| Expert Rating | 4.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1350 | 2240 |
| Performance Score | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| Comfort Score | 9.9 | 8.7 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick+ | 9.1 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.0 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.8 | 9.5 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Powerful 420 hp 6.2L EcoTec3 V8 with smooth 10-speed transmission; Air Ride Adaptive Suspension combined with Magnetic R... | Excellent EPA range for the class; Access to Tesla Supercharger network; Quick acceleration and smooth EV driving; Spaci... |
| Cons | Fuel economy is low at 16 MPG combined and requires premium gasoline; Large body dimensions and 24-inch wheels require c... | Minimalist interior may not suit all buyers; Ride can feel firm on larger wheels; Build quality can vary by production b... |
