Fiat Fastback vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Fiat Fastback
$24,999 – $26,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Fiat Fastback vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Fiat Fastback offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Fiat Fastback
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Fiat Fastback
$24,999 – $26,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Fiat Fastback |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fiat | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Fastback | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV Coupe | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $24,999 – $26,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $26,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $24,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.0L Turbo 3-Cylinder + 12V Mild Hybrid | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 130 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 10.2 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Hybrid | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 12.6 km/l city / 13.9 km/l highway | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Mild hybrid assist | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Low emission profile | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 12V Lithium-ion | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | Regenerative braking | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.0 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.6 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.0 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Distinctive coupe-SUV styling; Improved fuel economy with 12V mild-hybrid tech; Generous cargo capacity; Comfortable rid... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | CVT transmission can feel rubbery under hard acceleration; Limited rear headroom due to sloping roofline | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
