Dacia Bigster vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Dacia Bigster
€28,890 – €29,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Dacia Bigster vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Dacia Bigster offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Dacia Bigster
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Dacia Bigster
€28,890 – €29,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Dacia Bigster |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Dacia | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Bigster | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Crossover SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | €28,890 – €29,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | €29,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | €28,500 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.8-Liter 4-Cylinder Petrol Hybrid | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 155 hp (114 kW) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 172 Nm (Engine) / 205 Nm (Electric) | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 9.7 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph (180 km/h) | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Petrol/Electric Hybrid | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 4.8 - 5.5 L/100 km (WLTP combined) | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Up to 80% urban driving in electric mode | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 104 - 106 g/km CO2 | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 1.4 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | Self-charging via engine and regenerative braking | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.5 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.8 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Massive interior space and boot capacity; Impressive fuel efficiency from the 1.8L hybrid system; Rugged and stylish des... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Hybrid transmission can feel busy under hard acceleration; Cabin lacks high-end luxury acoustic dampening; Limited advan... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
