Chevrolet Equinox vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Ford Ranger
Chevrolet Equinox
$31,999 – $33,000
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Equinox vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs Ford Ranger. Chevrolet Equinox offers the strongest value on price. Ford Ranger leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Ford Ranger
Best Value
Chevrolet Equinox
Fuel Economy
Chevrolet Equinox
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Equinox
$31,999 – $33,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Equinox |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Equinox | Silverado 1500 | Ranger |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Compact SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck | Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $31,999 – $33,000 | $53,599 – $54,800 | $42,500 – $43,200 |
| MSRP | $33,000 | $54,800 | $43,200 |
| Dealer Price | $30,999 | $52,499 | $41,900 |
| Engine | 1.5L Turbocharged I4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo |
| Horsepower | 175 hp | 355 hp | 270 hp |
| Torque | 203 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 8.5 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 26 mpg combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) | 22 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Emissions | 342 g/mi | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | EPA compliant |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | — |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | — |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 870 | 1120 |
| Performance Score | 7.8 | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| Safety Score | Chevy Safety Assist | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.2 | 7.9 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Bolder, truck-inspired exterior design; Large 11.3-inch touchscreen with intuitive UI; Generous standard safety tech sui... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... |
| Cons | Only one engine option available at launch; Some hard plastics remain in lower cabin areas | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... |
