Alpine A290 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Alpine A290
$38,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Alpine A290 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Alpine A290
$38,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Alpine A290 |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alpine | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | A290 | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | Ev | — | — |
| Body Style | Hot Hatchback | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $38,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $38,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $37,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | Single Front-Mounted Electric Motor | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 177 hp (GT) / 218 hp (GTS / Performance) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 221 lb-ft (300 Nm) / 229 lb-ft (310 Nm) | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 6.4 seconds (0-62 mph for 218 hp variant) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 105 mph (170 km/h) | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A - Fully Electric | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Up to 236 miles (380 km) WLTP | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 52 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | 100 kW DC Fast Charging | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | Lane Keep Assist, Autonomous Emergency Braking | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.3 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Exceptional cornering agility and bespoke chassis tuning; Engaging Overtake (OV) boost steering wheel function; Distinct... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Front-wheel drive limits extreme power down-put compared to AWD setups; Rear passenger legroom is compact due to hatchba... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
