Alpine A290 vs Toyota RAV4
Alpine A290
$38,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Alpine A290 vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Alpine A290
$38,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Alpine A290 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A290 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Hot Hatchback | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $38,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $38,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $37,000 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Single Front-Mounted Electric Motor | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 177 hp (GT) / 218 hp (GTS / Performance) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 221 lb-ft (300 Nm) / 229 lb-ft (310 Nm) | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.4 seconds (0-62 mph for 218 hp variant) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 105 mph (170 km/h) | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A - Fully Electric | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | Up to 236 miles (380 km) WLTP | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 52 kWh | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | 100 kW DC Fast Charging | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Lane Keep Assist, Autonomous Emergency Braking | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.3 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Exceptional cornering agility and bespoke chassis tuning; Engaging Overtake (OV) boost steering wheel function; Distinct... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Front-wheel drive limits extreme power down-put compared to AWD setups; Rear passenger legroom is compact due to hatchba... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
