Mazda CX-50 vs Toyota RAV4
Mazda CX-50
$42,900
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mazda CX-50 vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Mazda CX-50 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-50
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Mazda CX-50
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mazda CX-50
$42,900
Rating: 4.7/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Mazda CX-50 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | CX-50 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Compact Rugged Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $42,900 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $42,900 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $41,800 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Skyactiv-G 2.5L Turbocharged I4 | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 256 hp (Premium) / 227 hp (Regular) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 320 lb-ft (Premium) / 310 lb-ft (Regular) | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 127 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 25 MPG Combined (23 City / 29 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | SULEV30 Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | N/A | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 118 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | i-Activsense with 360 View Monitor & Traffic Jam Assist | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 23 mpg | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Energetic 256 hp turbocharged engine with 320 lb-ft of torque and 3,500 lb towing capability; 360-degree View Monitor wi... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Fuel economy (25 MPG Combined) is lower than the CX-50 Hybrid models; 6-speed automatic transmission has fewer gears tha... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
