Mazda CX-50 vs Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-50
$42,900
Tesla Model Y
$47,990 – $48,990
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mazda CX-50 vs Tesla Model Y. Mazda CX-50 offers the strongest value on price. Mazda CX-50 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-50
Best Value
Mazda CX-50
Fuel Economy
Tesla Model Y
Performance
Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mazda CX-50
$42,900
Rating: 4.7/10
Tesla Model Y
$47,990 – $48,990
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Mazda CX-50 |
Tesla Model Y |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mazda | Tesla |
| Model | CX-50 | Model Y |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Ev |
| Body Style | Compact Rugged Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $42,900 | $47,990 – $48,990 |
| MSRP | $42,900 | $48,990 |
| Dealer Price | $41,800 | $47,990 |
| Engine | Skyactiv-G 2.5L Turbocharged I4 | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 256 hp (Premium) / 227 hp (Regular) | 384 hp (est.) |
| Torque | 320 lb-ft (Premium) / 310 lb-ft (Regular) | Instant electric torque |
| 0–60 mph | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 4.6 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 127 mph | 135 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | 25 MPG Combined (23 City / 29 Hwy) | 117 MPGe combined (EPA est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | 330 miles EPA (Long Range AWD est.) |
| Emissions | SULEV30 Certified | 0 g/mi |
| Battery | N/A | Approx. 75 kWh (usable, est.) |
| Charging | N/A | 250 kW DC peak (Supercharger V3) |
| Expert Rating | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 118 | 2240 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Comfort Score | 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Safety Score | i-Activsense with 360 View Monitor & Traffic Jam Assist | 9.1 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 23 mpg | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Energetic 256 hp turbocharged engine with 320 lb-ft of torque and 3,500 lb towing capability; 360-degree View Monitor wi... | Excellent EPA range for the class; Access to Tesla Supercharger network; Quick acceleration and smooth EV driving; Spaci... |
| Cons | Fuel economy (25 MPG Combined) is lower than the CX-50 Hybrid models; 6-speed automatic transmission has fewer gears tha... | Minimalist interior may not suit all buyers; Ride can feel firm on larger wheels; Build quality can vary by production b... |
