Mazda CX-50 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Mazda CX-50
$42,900
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mazda CX-50 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Mazda CX-50 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-50
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mazda CX-50
$42,900
Rating: 4.7/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Mazda CX-50 |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mazda | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | CX-50 | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Compact Rugged Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $42,900 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $42,900 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $41,800 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Skyactiv-G 2.5L Turbocharged I4 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 256 hp (Premium) / 227 hp (Regular) | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 320 lb-ft (Premium) / 310 lb-ft (Regular) | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 127 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 25 MPG Combined (23 City / 29 Hwy) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | SULEV30 Certified | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 118 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.4 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | i-Activsense with 360 View Monitor & Traffic Jam Assist | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 23 mpg | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Energetic 256 hp turbocharged engine with 320 lb-ft of torque and 3,500 lb towing capability; 360-degree View Monitor wi... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Fuel economy (25 MPG Combined) is lower than the CX-50 Hybrid models; 6-speed automatic transmission has fewer gears tha... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
