Wuling Xingguang S vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Wuling Xingguang S
CNY 89,800 – CNY 99,800
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Wuling Xingguang S vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Wuling Xingguang S
CNY 89,800 – CNY 99,800
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Wuling Xingguang S |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Wuling | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Xingguang S | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Compact SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | CNY 89,800 – CNY 99,800 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | CNY 99,800 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | CNY 89,800 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.5L / 1.5T Hybrid & Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 201 hp (EV) / 106 hp (Engine) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 310 Nm (EV) | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 7.7 sec (0-100 km/h EV) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 175 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric & Plug-in Hybrid | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 3.9L/100km (PHEV fuel consumption) | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | 510 km (EV CLTC) / 60-130 km (PHEV) | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Low emission hybrid / 0 g/mi EV | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 60 kWh / 20.5 kWh / 9.5 kWh LFP | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | Fast charging 30-80% in 20-30 mins | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 140 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.5 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.7 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.6 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Extremely spacious cabin and large trunk capacity; Choice of efficient EV and PHEV powertrains; Competitive pricing and... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Brand recognition outside domestic markets is still growing; Limited high-speed sporty handling dynamics; Base trims lac... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
