Toyota Sequoia vs Toyota RAV4
Toyota Sequoia
$81,210
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Toyota Sequoia vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Sequoia leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Sequoia
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota Sequoia
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Toyota Sequoia
$81,210
Rating: 7.5/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Toyota Sequoia |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Sequoia | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $81,210 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $81,210 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $81,210 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 3.4L Twin-Turbo V6 Hybrid (i-FORCE MAX) | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 437 hp @ 5,200 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 583 lb-ft @ 2,400 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 20 MPGe combined (19 City / 22 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 450 miles total highway range | N/A |
| Emissions | 395 g/mi CO2 | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 1.87 kWh Ni-MH | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | Self-charging regenerative braking | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 7.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 750 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.0 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5 (TSS 2.5) | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Standard 437 hp i-FORCE MAX hybrid powertrain; Impressive 9,520 lbs maximum towing capacity; Excellent 20-22 MPG combine... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Third-row seat does not fold completely flat into the floor; Cargo space behind third row is smaller than some competito... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
