Suzuki Swift Sport vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Suzuki Swift Sport
JPY 2,329,800
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Suzuki Swift Sport vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Suzuki Swift Sport leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Suzuki Swift Sport
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Suzuki Swift Sport
JPY 2,329,800
Rating: 4.8/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Suzuki Swift Sport |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Suzuki | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Swift Sport | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | JPY 2,329,800 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | JPY 2,329,800 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | JPY 2,300,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.4L BoosterJet Turbo 4-cylinder | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 138 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 170 lb-ft (230 Nm) | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | approx. 6.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 6.8 L/100 km combined | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 157 g/km | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | N/A | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | N/A | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | Suzuki Safety Support / DSBS | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.2 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Spirited 1.4L BoosterJet turbo engine with strong torque; Extremely lightweight handling and rigid HEARTECT platform; Ex... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Limited production run availability; Firm ride quality tailored for sporty handling; Manual climate controls on base lay... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
