Smart #3 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Smart #3
€48,490
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Smart #3 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Smart #3
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Smart #3
€48,490
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Smart #3 |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Smart | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | #3 | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | Ev | — | — |
| Body Style | Electric SUV Coupe | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | €48,490 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | €48,490 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | €47,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | Dual Motor AWD (Brabus) | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 422 hp (315 kW) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 543 Nm (400 lb-ft) | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 3.7 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 17.6 kWh/100km WLTP | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | 415 km WLTP | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 66 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | 150 kW DC (10-80% in 30 min) | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 450 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.4 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.2 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.1 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.6 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Blistering acceleration (0-100 km/h in 3.7s); Distinctive and aggressive Brabus styling; Spacious coupe-SUV layout; Comp... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Firm ride quality due to sports tuning; Real-world range drops during spirited driving; Rear headroom slightly compromis... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
