Skoda Superb vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Skoda Superb
€44,200 – €45,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Skoda Superb vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Skoda Superb
€44,200 – €45,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Skoda Superb |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Skoda | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Superb | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Liftback | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | €44,200 – €45,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | €45,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | €43,500 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.5 TSI petrol + Electric Motor | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 204 hp (system output) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 7.1 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 220 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Plug-in Hybrid (Petrol / Electric) | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | High efficiency hybrid mode | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Up to 80 miles WLTP | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Low CO2 emissions | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 19.7 kWh net | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | 11 kW AC / 50 kW DC | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Impressive all-electric driving range; Supports 50 kW DC fast charging; Enormous cabin and boot space; High comfort leve... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Slightly reduced boot space compared to standard petrol models; Steering can feel detached; Substantial physical footpri... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
