Peugeot E-3008 vs Toyota RAV4
Peugeot E-3008
€47,200 – €48,500
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Peugeot E-3008 vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Peugeot E-3008
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Peugeot E-3008
€47,200 – €48,500
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Peugeot E-3008 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Peugeot | Toyota |
| Model | E-3008 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Fastback SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | €47,200 – €48,500 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | €48,500 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | €46,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Dual Motor AWD | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 325 hp (240 kW) | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 375 lb-ft (509 Nm) | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.0 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h (112 mph) | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 490 km WLTP (306 miles) | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 73 kWh | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | 160 kW DC (20-80% in 30 min) | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 85 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Powerful 325 hp dual motor AWD setup; Striking fastback SUV exterior design; Immersive 21-inch Panoramic i-Cockpit; Refi... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Slower max DC charging rate compared to 800V rivals; Rear headroom slightly compromised by fastback roofline; Compact st... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
