Nissan Kicks vs Toyota RAV4
Nissan Kicks
$28,505
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Nissan Kicks vs Toyota RAV4. Nissan Kicks offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Nissan Kicks
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Nissan Kicks
$28,505
Rating: 4.1/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Nissan Kicks |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Kicks | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Crossover | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $28,505 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $28,505 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $27,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.0L DOHC 16-Valve 4-Cylinder (MR20DD) | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 141 hp @ 6,000 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 140 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 9.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 30 MPGe combined (27 City / 34 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 400 miles total highway tank range | N/A |
| Emissions | 295 g/mi CO2 | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V starter battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.1/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 640 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 6.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Nissan Safety Shield 360 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Standard 12.3-inch infotainment screen with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto across all trims; Available Intelligent... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | 2.0L engine performance is tuned for fuel efficiency rather than brisk acceleration; 19-inch wheels on SR trim create a... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
