Nissan Kicks vs Nissan Kicks vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Nissan Kicks
$28,505
Nissan Kicks
$21,990
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Nissan Kicks vs Nissan Kicks vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Nissan Kicks offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Nissan Kicks
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Nissan Kicks
$28,505
Rating: 4.1/10
Nissan Kicks
$21,990
Rating: 4.5/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Nissan Kicks |
Nissan Kicks |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nissan | Nissan | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Kicks | Kicks | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Crossover | Subcompact SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $28,505 | $21,990 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $28,505 | $21,990 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $27,500 | $21,500 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 2.0L DOHC 16-Valve 4-Cylinder (MR20DD) | 2.0L DOHC 16-Valve 4-Cylinder | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 141 hp @ 6,000 rpm | 141 hp @ 6,000 rpm | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 140 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | 140 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 9.8 sec (0-60 mph) | N/A | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | N/A | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 30 MPGe combined (27 City / 34 Hwy) | 28/35 MPG City/Hwy (FWD) or 27/34 MPG City/Hwy (AWD) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 400 miles total highway tank range | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 295 g/mi CO2 | Low emission vehicle profile | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 12V starter battery | Standard 12V | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.1/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 640 | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 6.8 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.5 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | Nissan Safety Shield 360 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.8 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Standard 12.3-inch infotainment screen with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto across all trims; Available Intelligent... | Class-leading 8.4 inches of ground clearance; Strong fuel economy up to 35 MPG highway; Available Intelligent All-Wheel... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | 2.0L engine performance is tuned for fuel efficiency rather than brisk acceleration; 19-inch wheels on SR trim create a... | CVT can feel strained under hard acceleration; Acceleration is tuned more for efficiency than sportiness | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
