Nissan Armada vs Toyota RAV4
Nissan Armada
$80,550
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Nissan Armada vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Nissan Armada leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Nissan Armada
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Nissan Armada
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Nissan Armada
$80,550
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Nissan Armada |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $80,550 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $80,550 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $78,800 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 3.5L Twin-Turbocharged DOHC 24-Valve V6 | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 425 hp @ 5,600 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 516 lb-ft @ 3,600 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.6 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 17 MPG Combined (16 City / 19 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V heavy-duty battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1150 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick+ | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.3 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Potent 425 hp / 516 lb-ft 3.5L Twin-Turbo V6 engine with smooth 9-speed automatic; Heavy-duty 8,500 lbs towing capacity... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | 17 MPG combined fuel economy requires premium fuel for peak output; Large body dimensions can make tight urban maneuveri... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
