Nissan Armada vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Nissan Armada
$80,550
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Nissan Armada vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Nissan Armada leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Nissan Armada
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Nissan Armada
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Nissan Armada
$80,550
Rating: 4.8/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Nissan Armada |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nissan | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Armada | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | Suv | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $80,550 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $80,550 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $78,800 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | 3.5L Twin-Turbocharged DOHC 24-Valve V6 | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 425 hp @ 5,600 rpm | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 516 lb-ft @ 3,600 rpm | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.6 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Premium Unleaded Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 17 MPG Combined (16 City / 19 Hwy) | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 12V heavy-duty battery | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1150 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 9.4 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.8 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick+ | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.3 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.6 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.1 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Potent 425 hp / 516 lb-ft 3.5L Twin-Turbo V6 engine with smooth 9-speed automatic; Heavy-duty 8,500 lbs towing capacity... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | 17 MPG combined fuel economy requires premium fuel for peak output; Large body dimensions can make tight urban maneuveri... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
