Mitsubishi Xforce HEV vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Mitsubishi Xforce HEV
$27,500 – $28,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mitsubishi Xforce HEV vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Mitsubishi Xforce HEV offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Mitsubishi Xforce HEV
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mitsubishi Xforce HEV
$27,500 – $28,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Mitsubishi Xforce HEV |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mitsubishi | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Xforce HEV | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Compact SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $27,500 – $28,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $28,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $26,800 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.5L MIVEC Engine + Electric Motor | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 114 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 10.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 170 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 20+ km/L estimated | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Short-distance EV mode capability | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Low emission hybrid certified | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | Self-charging via engine and regenerative braking | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | ABS with EBD and Brake Assist | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Excellent fuel economy with hybrid powertrain; Class-leading ground clearance (222 mm); Dynamic Sound Yamaha audio syste... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Front-wheel drive only variant at launch; CVT transmission can be noisy under hard acceleration; Limited availability in... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
