MINI Cooper Convertible vs MINI Cooper Convertible vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
MINI Cooper Convertible
$40,999 – $41,500
MINI Cooper Convertible
$40,999 – $41,500
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing MINI Cooper Convertible vs MINI Cooper Convertible vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
MINI Cooper Convertible
$40,999 – $41,500
Rating: 4.6/10
MINI Cooper Convertible
$40,999 – $41,500
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
MINI Cooper Convertible |
MINI Cooper Convertible |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MINI | MINI | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Cooper Convertible | Cooper Convertible | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Convertible | Convertible | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $40,999 – $41,500 | $40,999 – $41,500 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $41,500 | $41,500 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $39,999 | $39,999 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 2.0L TwinPower Turbo 4-cylinder | 2.0L TwinPower Turbo 4-cylinder | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 228 hp | 228 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 236 lb-ft | 236 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 6.3 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.3 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 152 mph | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 25 mpg city / 34 mpg highway | 25 mpg city / 34 mpg highway | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Standard Tier 3 Bin 125 | Standard Tier 3 Bin 125 | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | N/A | N/A | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | N/A | N/A | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 45 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 9.2 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 7.5 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.5 | 8.5 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.0 | 8.0 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.2 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Exhilarating acceleration and agile handling; Distinctive iconic styling with JCW aggressive touches; High-tech circular... | Exhilarating acceleration and agile handling; Distinctive iconic styling with JCW aggressive touches; High-tech circular... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Stiff ride quality over rough pavement; Very limited rear passenger legroom; Small cargo capacity with top down | Stiff ride quality over rough pavement; Very limited rear passenger legroom; Small cargo capacity with top down | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
