Mazda Arata vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Mazda Arata
$42,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Mazda Arata vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Ford Ranger
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Mazda Arata
$42,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Mazda Arata |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Mazda | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Arata | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | Ev | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $42,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $42,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $40,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Electric Motor | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | Estimated 250-300 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | Instant EV Torque | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Approx. 6.0 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph (Electronically limited) | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A (Battery Electric) | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Approx. 300 miles target range | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | High-capacity Lithium-ion pack | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | DC Fast Charge enabled | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.7 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Striking Kodo exterior design; Spacious crossover layout; Advanced digital cockpit; Balanced electric performance; Focus... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Production timeline details still evolving; Limited real-world availability data as a newer platform | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
