Maserati MC20 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Maserati MC20
$350,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Maserati MC20 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Maserati MC20 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Maserati MC20
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Maserati MC20
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Maserati MC20
$350,000
Rating: 4.9/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Maserati MC20 |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Maserati | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | MC20 | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Coupe | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $350,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $350,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $340,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 3.0L Twin-Turbocharged V6 Nettuno | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 640 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 538 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 2.8 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 324 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Standard compliance | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | N/A | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | N/A | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.9/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.9 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 6.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.0 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 5.0 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.2 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Phenomenal 640 hp Nettuno V6 engine; Massive 500 kg maximum downforce capability; Track-tuned suspension and razor-sharp... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Spartan cabin compared to standard road car; Extremely limited production and high price point; Stiff ride quality not o... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
