Lexus LBX vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Lexus LBX
$48,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Lexus LBX vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Lexus LBX leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Lexus LBX
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Lexus LBX
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Lexus LBX
$48,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Lexus LBX |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Lexus | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | LBX | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Compact SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $48,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $48,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $47,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.6L Turbocharged Inline-3 | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.2 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 24 MPG combined | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | N/A | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Varies by region | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | N/A | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | N/A | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.5 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.2 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | Lexus Safety System + | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.5 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.6 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Thrilling 300-hp turbo engine performance; Advanced GR-Four inspired AWD system; Distinctive aggressive body styling; Dr... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Firm ride quality due to sport tuning; Limited rear cargo room compared to larger SUVs; Higher fuel consumption than sta... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
