Lamborghini Urus vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Lamborghini Urus
$358,332
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Lamborghini Urus vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Lamborghini Urus leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Lamborghini Urus
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Lamborghini Urus
Performance
Lamborghini Urus
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Lamborghini Urus
$358,332
Rating: 4.9/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Lamborghini Urus |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Lamborghini | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Urus | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Super SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $358,332 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $358,332 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $350,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8 Plug-in Hybrid | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 789 hp (800 CV) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 701 lb-ft (950 Nm) | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 3.4 sec (0-62 mph / 0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 194 mph (312 km/h) | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Petrol-Electric Hybrid | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 48 MPGe combined (EPA) | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Approx. 60 km (37 miles) | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 140 g/km (WLTP) | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 25.9 kWh Lithium-ion | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | 7.2 kW AC onboard charger | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.9/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.8 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.2 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Astounding 800 horsepower combined output; Instant electric torque response; Luxurious pilot-inspired cockpit with advan... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Extremely high purchase and maintenance costs; Heavier curb weight due to the battery pack; Limited widespread availabil... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
