IM Motors L6 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
IM Motors L6
$32,999 – $34,500
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing IM Motors L6 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. IM Motors L6 offers the strongest value on price. IM Motors L6 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
IM Motors L6
Best Value
IM Motors L6
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
IM Motors L6
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
IM Motors L6
$32,999 – $34,500
Rating: 4.8/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
IM Motors L6 |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | IM Motors | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | L6 | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Fastback Sedan | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $32,999 – $34,500 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $34,500 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $31,999 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Dual Motor AWD | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 787 hp | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 2.74 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 268 km/h | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 18.5 kWh / 100 km | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 1,000+ km CLTC | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 130 kWh Solid-State | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | 900V Ultra-fast DC (Add 400km range in 12 mins) | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 45 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 9.6 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.0 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 9.4 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.8 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.9 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.4 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Breakthrough solid-state battery option with 1,000+ km range; Blistering 0-100 km/h acceleration in 2.74 seconds; Advanc... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Brand recognition still growing globally; High demand for solid-state variants may involve waiting lists; Steep learning... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
