Hongqi Guoya vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Hongqi Guoya
$261,790
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Hongqi Guoya vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Hongqi Guoya leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Hongqi Guoya
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Hongqi Guoya
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Hongqi Guoya
$261,790
Rating: 4.8/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Hongqi Guoya |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hongqi | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Guoya | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Full-Size Luxury Sedan | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $261,790 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $261,790 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $255,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8 + Electric Motor | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 476 hp (350 kW) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 680 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 4.3 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 250 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 8.8 L/100km WLTC | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Extended hybrid range | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Low emission hybrid | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | NMC lithium-ion | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | Plug-in Hybrid charging support | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 450 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.8 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.5 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.2 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.5 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Mighty 4.0L twin-turbo V8 hybrid performance; Exquisite wood and leather executive interior; Advanced rear-wheel steerin... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Very large footprint can be challenging in tight spaces; High acquisition and maintenance cost; Limited global dealer ne... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
