GWM Tank 700 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
GWM Tank 700
$68,500 – $70,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing GWM Tank 700 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
GWM Tank 700
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
GWM Tank 700
$68,500 – $70,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
GWM Tank 700 |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | GWM | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Tank 700 | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Full-size SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $68,500 – $70,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $70,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $67,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 3.0L Twin-Turbo V6 Hybrid | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 517 hp | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.5 sec (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 210 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Plug-in Hybrid (Petrol + Electric) | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | Approx. 10.9 L/100km (Combined) | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | 90 km WLTC | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Low emission hybrid standards | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 37.1 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | DC Fast Charging | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.4 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Brute 517 hp twin-turbo V6 hybrid performance; Advanced Hi4-T four-wheel drive system; Opulent and spacious luxury inter... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Large footprint makes tight urban parking challenging; High curb weight affects agility; Fuel consumption increases when... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
