GMC Canyon vs Toyota RAV4
GMC Canyon
$67,995
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing GMC Canyon vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. GMC Canyon leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
GMC Canyon
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
GMC Canyon
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
GMC Canyon
$67,995
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
GMC Canyon |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | GMC | Toyota |
| Model | Canyon | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Pickup Truck | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $67,995 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $67,995 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $66,200 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.7L TurboMax Inline 4-Cylinder | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 310 hp @ 5,600 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 430 lb-ft @ 3,000 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 98 mph (electronically limited for 35-in MT tires) | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 16 MPG Combined (16 City / 16 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V heavy-duty battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 940 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 6.8 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Extreme off-road capability with 35-inch Goodyear MT tires and 12.2 inches of ground clearance; Multimatic DSSV dampers... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Fuel economy is low at 16 MPG combined due to 35-inch mud-terrain tires and high lift; Towing capacity drops to 5,500 lb... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
