Ford Puma Gen-E vs Ford Puma vs Toyota RAV4
Ford Puma Gen-E
£29,995
Ford Puma
£37,500 – £38,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Puma Gen-E vs Ford Puma vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Puma Gen-E
£29,995
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Puma
£37,500 – £38,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Ford Puma Gen-E |
Ford Puma |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Puma Gen-E | Puma | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Compact SUV | Crossover | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | £29,995 | £37,500 – £38,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | £29,995 | £38,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | £28,995 | — | $35,199 |
| Engine | Single Electric Motor FWD | Electric Motor | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 168 hp (124 kW) | 168 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 290 Nm (214 lb-ft) | 290 Nm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 8.0 sec (0-62 mph) | 8.0 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 99 mph (160 km/h) | 160 km/h | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 5.4 miles per kWh | — | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 233 miles WLTP | 376 km (WLTP) | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | — | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 43 kWh usable | — | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | 100 kW DC (10-80% in 23 min) | — | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | — | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | — | 9.2 |
| Pros | Exceptional city efficiency and energy economy; Engaging, responsive steering and handling; Clever storage including the... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... | |
| Cons | Smaller battery capacity limits long highway range; Rear legroom can feel snug for taller passengers; Optional advanced... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... | |
