Ford Puma Gen-E vs Ford Puma vs Cadillac Escalade
Ford Puma Gen-E
£29,995
Ford Puma
£37,500 – £38,000
Cadillac Escalade
$123,295
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Puma Gen-E vs Ford Puma vs Cadillac Escalade. Ford Puma Gen-E offers the strongest value on price. Cadillac Escalade leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Cadillac Escalade
Best Value
Ford Puma Gen-E
Fuel Economy
Cadillac Escalade
Performance
Cadillac Escalade
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Puma Gen-E
£29,995
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Puma
£37,500 – £38,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Cadillac Escalade
$123,295
Rating: 4.9/10
| Specification |
Ford Puma Gen-E |
Ford Puma |
Cadillac Escalade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Puma Gen-E | Puma | Escalade |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Compact SUV | Crossover | SUV |
| Current Price | £29,995 | £37,500 – £38,000 | $123,295 |
| MSRP | £29,995 | £38,000 | $123,295 |
| Dealer Price | £28,995 | — | $121,000 |
| Engine | Single Electric Motor FWD | Electric Motor | 6.2L V8 with Dynamic Fuel Management & VVT |
| Horsepower | 168 hp (124 kW) | 168 hp | 420 hp @ 5,600 rpm |
| Torque | 290 Nm (214 lb-ft) | 290 Nm | 460 lb-ft @ 4,100 rpm |
| 0–60 mph | 8.0 sec (0-62 mph) | 8.0 sec (0-100 km/h) | 5.9 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 99 mph (160 km/h) | 160 km/h | 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Premium Unleaded Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 5.4 miles per kWh | — | 16 MPG Combined (14 City / 18 Hwy) |
| Range (EV) | 233 miles WLTP | 376 km (WLTP) | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | — | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) |
| Battery | 43 kWh usable | — | 12V heavy-duty maintenance-free battery |
| Charging | 100 kW DC (10-80% in 23 min) | — | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.9/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1520 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.0 | 9.3 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 8.5 | Top Safety Pick+ |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | — | 7.0 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.9 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | — | 9.0 |
| Pros | Exceptional city efficiency and energy economy; Engaging, responsive steering and handling; Clever storage including the... | Showstopping pillar-to-pillar 55-inch curved HD display across the entire dashboard; Unmatched ride quality via Air Ride... | |
| Cons | Smaller battery capacity limits long highway range; Rear legroom can feel snug for taller passengers; Optional advanced... | 16 MPG combined fuel economy requires premium gasoline; High price tag exceeding $123,000 MSRP; Large body footprint req... | |
