Ford Puma Gen-E vs Ford Puma vs Toyota Corolla
Ford Puma Gen-E
£29,995
Ford Puma
£37,500 – £38,000
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Puma Gen-E vs Ford Puma vs Toyota Corolla. Toyota Corolla offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Corolla leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Corolla
Best Value
Toyota Corolla
Fuel Economy
Toyota Corolla
Performance
Toyota Corolla
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Puma Gen-E
£29,995
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Puma
£37,500 – £38,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Toyota Corolla
$28,799 – $29,500
Rating: 4.6/10
| Specification |
Ford Puma Gen-E |
Ford Puma |
Toyota Corolla |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Puma Gen-E | Puma | Corolla |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Compact SUV | Crossover | Compact Sedan |
| Current Price | £29,995 | £37,500 – £38,000 | $28,799 – $29,500 |
| MSRP | £29,995 | £38,000 | $29,500 |
| Dealer Price | £28,995 | — | $28,299 |
| Engine | Single Electric Motor FWD | Electric Motor | 2.0L Dynamic Force Inline-4 |
| Horsepower | 168 hp (124 kW) | 168 hp | 169 hp |
| Torque | 290 Nm (214 lb-ft) | 290 Nm | 151 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 8.0 sec (0-62 mph) | 8.0 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 8.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 99 mph (160 km/h) | 160 km/h | Approx. 118 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 5.4 miles per kWh | — | 35 MPG combined |
| Range (EV) | 233 miles WLTP | 376 km (WLTP) | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | — | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 43 kWh usable | — | N/A |
| Charging | 100 kW DC (10-80% in 23 min) | — | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 0 | 1680 |
| Performance Score | 8.2 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 9.0 | 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | — | 9.2 |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Value Score | 8.7 | — | 9.1 |
| Pros | Exceptional city efficiency and energy economy; Engaging, responsive steering and handling; Clever storage including the... | Excellent reliability reputation; Strong fuel economy; Comprehensive standard safety features; Affordable ownership and... | |
| Cons | Smaller battery capacity limits long highway range; Rear legroom can feel snug for taller passengers; Optional advanced... | Rear-seat space is moderate for tall adults; Performance is adequate but not sporty; Some premium tech requires higher t... | |
