Ford F-150 Lightning vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Ford F-150 Lightning
$63,345
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford F-150 Lightning vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Ford F-150 Lightning
Performance
Ford F-150 Lightning
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford F-150 Lightning
$63,345
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Ford F-150 Lightning |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | F-150 Lightning | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Full-size pickup truck | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $63,345 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $63,345 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | — | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Dual eMotor, front and rear mounted | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 536 hp (planned STX) | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 775 lb-ft (planned STX) | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Mid-4-second 0-60 mph carryover estimate; not finalized for 2026 STX | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | Not officially published for the planned 2026 STX | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | EPA MPGe not finalized; targeted 290-mile driving range | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | Targeted 290 miles EPA-estimated (planned) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi tailpipe emissions for the planned battery-electric model | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 123 kWh usable extended-range lithium-ion battery (planned) | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | 11.5 kW Level 2 peak; 2026 DC fast-charge time not finalized | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | — | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 0.0 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 0.0 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 0.0 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 0.0 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 0.0 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 0.0 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Planned 123 kWh usable extended-range battery; Planned 536 hp and 775 lb-ft dual-motor output; Targeted 290-mile EPA-est... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Canceled before normal 2026 retail production; Final EPA MPGe and charging certification were not issued; No current dea... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
