Ford Expedition MAX vs Toyota RAV4
Ford Expedition MAX
$77,250
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Ford Expedition MAX vs Toyota RAV4. Toyota RAV4 offers the strongest value on price. Ford Expedition MAX leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Ford Expedition MAX
Best Value
Toyota RAV4
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Ford Expedition MAX
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Ford Expedition MAX
$77,250
Rating: 4.8/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Ford Expedition MAX |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Expedition MAX | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $77,250 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $77,250 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $75,600 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 3.5L EcoBoost Twin-Turbocharged V6 | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 400 hp @ 5,200 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft @ 3,300 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 5.9 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline (Premium recommended for HO version) | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 18 MPG Combined (15 City / 22 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV30) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V maintenance-free battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1120 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Top Safety Pick | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 7.3 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Immense 37.4 cu ft cargo capacity behind the 3rd row (11.8 inches longer than standard Expedition); Futuristic 24-inch p... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Substantial 221.7-inch total length requires extra garage depth; 18 MPG combined fuel economy trails smaller unibody cro... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
