Chevrolet Trax vs Toyota RAV4
Chevrolet Trax
$25,395
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Chevrolet Trax vs Toyota RAV4. Chevrolet Trax offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Chevrolet Trax
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Toyota RAV4
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Chevrolet Trax
$25,395
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Chevrolet Trax |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Trax | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Crossover | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $25,395 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $25,395 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $24,500 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 1.2L ECOTEC Turbocharged 3-Cylinder | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 137 hp @ 5,000 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 162 lb-ft @ 2,500 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 8.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 30 MPGe combined (28 City / 32 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 415 miles total highway tank range | N/A |
| Emissions | 290 g/mi CO2 | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V starter battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1280 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Chevy Safety Assist | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.9 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Unbeatable price-to-feature value across all trims; Available 11-inch infotainment screen paired with an 8-inch digital... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | All-Wheel Drive (AWD) is not offered (FWD only); 137 hp engine is tuned for efficiency and urban commuting rather than f... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
