| Specification | Chevrolet Trax | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Trax | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Crossover | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $25,395 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $25,395 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $24,500 | $35,199 |
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 1.2L ECOTEC Turbocharged 3-Cylinder | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 137 hp @ 5,000 rpm | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 162 lb-ft @ 2,500 rpm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 8.8 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 30 MPGe combined (28 City / 32 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 415 miles total highway tank range | N/A |
| Emissions | 290 g/mi CO2 | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 12V starter battery | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 1280 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | Chevy Safety Assist | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.9 | 9.2 |
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pros | Unbeatable price-to-feature value across all trims; Available 11-inch infotainment screen paired with an 8-inch digital... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | All-Wheel Drive (AWD) is not offered (FWD only); 137 hp engine is tuned for efficiency and urban commuting rather than f... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |