Changan Nevo A07 vs Toyota RAV4
Changan Nevo A07
$19,999 – $21,000
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Changan Nevo A07 vs Toyota RAV4. Changan Nevo A07 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota RAV4 leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota RAV4
Best Value
Changan Nevo A07
Fuel Economy
Toyota RAV4
Performance
Changan Nevo A07
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Changan Nevo A07
$19,999 – $21,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Changan Nevo A07 |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Changan | Toyota |
| Model | Nevo A07 | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | — |
| Body Style | Liftback / Fastback Sedan | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $19,999 – $21,000 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $21,000 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $18,900 | $35,199 |
| Engine | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor / 1.5L Range Extender Option | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | Up to 258 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 290 Nm | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 6.9 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 172 km/h | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Pure Electric / Hybrid EREV | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 12.5 kWh per 100 km energy consumption | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | 730 km CLTC | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi (Pure EV) | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | 77.94 kWh | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | DC Fast Charging supported | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | ABS, EBD, ESP, Traction Control | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.6 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Up to 730 km CLTC range on pure electric models; Sleek fastback styling with frameless doors and 0.22 Cd drag coefficien... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Brand recognition still growing outside of primary markets; Rear headroom slightly compromised by sloping roofline for t... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |
