Changan Nevo A07 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Changan Nevo A07
$19,999 – $21,000
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Changan Nevo A07 vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Changan Nevo A07 offers the strongest value on price. Honda CR-V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Honda CR-V
Best Value
Changan Nevo A07
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Changan Nevo A07
$19,999 – $21,000
Rating: 4.6/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Changan Nevo A07 |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Changan | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Nevo A07 | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Liftback / Fastback Sedan | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | $19,999 – $21,000 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | $21,000 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | $18,900 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor / 1.5L Range Extender Option | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | Up to 258 hp | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 6.9 sec (0-100 km/h) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 172 km/h | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Pure Electric / Hybrid EREV | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | 12.5 kWh per 100 km energy consumption | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 730 km CLTC | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi (Pure EV) | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 77.94 kWh | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | DC Fast Charging supported | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.6/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 8.4 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.2 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | ABS, EBD, ESP, Traction Control | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.4 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 9.3 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 9.6 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Up to 730 km CLTC range on pure electric models; Sleek fastback styling with frameless doors and 0.22 Cd drag coefficien... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Brand recognition still growing outside of primary markets; Rear headroom slightly compromised by sloping roofline for t... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
