Changan Deepal G318 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Changan Deepal G318
$23,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Changan Deepal G318 vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Changan Deepal G318 offers the strongest value on price. Toyota Camry leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Toyota Camry
Best Value
Changan Deepal G318
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Changan Deepal G318
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Changan Deepal G318
$23,000
Rating: 4.5/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Changan Deepal G318 |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Changan | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Deepal G318 | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Rugged Midsize Off-Road SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $23,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $23,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $22,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 1.5L Turbo Range Extender + Dual Electric Motors | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 425 hp (AWD Variant) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 545 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | approx. 5.9 seconds (0-100 km/h) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 175 km/h | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid (Gasoline + Electric) | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | High combined fuel and electrical efficiency | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Up to nearly 190 km pure electric (CLTC) / 1,000+ km total combined range | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Low extended range emissions profile | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 18.99 kWh / 35.07 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | DC Fast Charging & Onboard RE generation | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.5/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 8.8 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 8.9 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 8.9 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.4 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Striking mecha-inspired rugged exterior design; Dual-motor AWD with robust off-road capabilities; Extended total driving... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Boxy shape can create slight wind noise at highway velocities; Hefty dimensions require care in narrow urban parking lot... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
