Caterham Project V vs Tesla Model Y
Caterham Project V
£80,000
Tesla Model Y
$47,990 – $48,990
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Caterham Project V vs Tesla Model Y. Tesla Model Y offers the strongest value on price. Caterham Project V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Caterham Project V
Best Value
Tesla Model Y
Fuel Economy
Tesla Model Y
Performance
Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Caterham Project V
£80,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Tesla Model Y
$47,990 – $48,990
Rating: 4.7/10
| Specification |
Caterham Project V |
Tesla Model Y |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Caterham | Tesla |
| Model | Project V | Model Y |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Ev |
| Body Style | Electric Sports Coupe | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | £80,000 | $47,990 – $48,990 |
| MSRP | £80,000 | $48,990 |
| Dealer Price | £80,000 | $47,990 |
| Engine | Single Motor Rear-Wheel Drive | Dual Motor AWD |
| Horsepower | 272 hp (200 kW) | 384 hp (est.) |
| Torque | N/A | Instant electric torque |
| 0–60 mph | Under 4.5 seconds (0-62 mph) | 4.6 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 143 mph (230 km/h) | 135 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A - Fully Electric | 117 MPGe combined (EPA est.) |
| Range (EV) | 249 miles WLTP (400 km) | 330 miles EPA (Long Range AWD est.) |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | 0 g/mi |
| Battery | 55 kWh | Approx. 75 kWh (usable, est.) |
| Charging | 150 kW DC (15-80% in 15 min) | 250 kW DC peak (Supercharger V3) |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 2240 |
| Performance Score | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Comfort Score | 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 9.0 |
| Pros | Class-leading low kerb weight of 1,190 kg; Agile rear-wheel drive handling dynamics; Fast 150 kW DC charging capability;... | Excellent EPA range for the class; Access to Tesla Supercharger network; Quick acceleration and smooth EV driving; Spaci... |
| Cons | Limited rear seating space in 2+1 layout; Targeted niche production volume; Real-world range constrained by lightweight... | Minimalist interior may not suit all buyers; Ride can feel firm on larger wheels; Build quality can vary by production b... |
