Caterham Project V vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Caterham Project V
£80,000
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Caterham Project V vs Honda CR-V vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500. Honda CR-V offers the strongest value on price. Caterham Project V leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Caterham Project V
Best Value
Honda CR-V
Fuel Economy
Honda CR-V
Performance
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Caterham Project V
£80,000
Rating: 4.8/10
Honda CR-V
$37,899 – $38,650
Rating: 4.7/10
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
$53,599 – $54,800
Rating: 4.5/10
| Specification |
Caterham Project V |
Honda CR-V |
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Caterham | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Project V | CR-V | Silverado 1500 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | Ev | Suv | — |
| Body Style | Electric Sports Coupe | Compact Crossover SUV | Full-Size Pickup Truck |
| Current Price | £80,000 | $37,899 – $38,650 | $53,599 – $54,800 |
| MSRP | £80,000 | $38,650 | $54,800 |
| Dealer Price | £80,000 | $37,299 | $52,499 |
| Engine | Single Motor Rear-Wheel Drive | 1.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 |
| Horsepower | 272 hp (200 kW) | 190 hp | 355 hp |
| Torque | N/A | 179 lb-ft | 383 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | Under 4.5 seconds (0-62 mph) | Approx. 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 6.1 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 143 mph (230 km/h) | Approx. 116 mph | Approx. 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Mileage / MPG | N/A - Fully Electric | 29 MPG combined | 18 MPG combined (EPA est., configuration dependent) |
| Range (EV) | 249 miles WLTP (400 km) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/mi | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards | Meets applicable U.S. federal and state standards |
| Battery | 55 kWh | N/A | N/A |
| Charging | 150 kW DC (15-80% in 15 min) | N/A | N/A |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1340 | 870 |
| Performance Score | 9.5 | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 8.2 | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Safety Score | 8.8 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Technology Score | 8.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
| Value Score | 8.9 | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Pros | Class-leading low kerb weight of 1,190 kg; Agile rear-wheel drive handling dynamics; Fast 150 kW DC charging capability;... | Spacious and practical cabin design; Strong standard and available safety tech; Comfortable ride and quiet interior; Com... | Strong maximum towing capability; Broad engine and trim lineup; Useful trailer and bed technologies; Large infotainment... |
| Cons | Limited rear seating space in 2+1 layout; Targeted niche production volume; Real-world range constrained by lightweight... | Acceleration is adequate rather than sporty; Higher trims increase total cost quickly; No dedicated performance-oriented... | Ride quality can feel firm on rough surfaces; Fuel economy is average for the segment; Some advanced features locked to... |
