Bentley Continental GT Speed vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Bentley Continental GT Speed
$300,000
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Bentley Continental GT Speed vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Bentley Continental GT Speed leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Bentley Continental GT Speed
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Bentley Continental GT Speed
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Bentley Continental GT Speed
$300,000
Rating: 4.9/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Bentley Continental GT Speed |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Bentley | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Continental GT Speed | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | — | — | — |
| Body Style | Luxury Grand Tourer Coupe | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $300,000 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $300,000 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $295,000 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | 4.0L Twin-Turbocharged V8 + Electric Motor (Plug-In Hybrid) | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 771 hp (782 PS) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 738 lb-ft (1,000 Nm) | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 3.1 seconds (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 208 mph (335 km/h) | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid / Gasoline | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | Exceptional efficiency via plug-in hybrid mode | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | Approx. 50 miles (WLTP) | — | N/A |
| Emissions | Significantly reduced CO2 emissions with EV capability | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 25.9 kWh | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | Plug-in capable | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.9/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.8 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | 9.4 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 8.5 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.5 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Staggering 771 horsepower from the Ultra Performance Hybrid V8; Pure electric driving capability for city commutes (~50... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | Extremely high six-figure purchase price; Substantial vehicle weight due to battery pack and luxury equipment | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
