Audi Q6 e-tron vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry
Audi Q6 e-tron
$64,900 – $65,900
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Toyota Camry
$36,795
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Audi Q6 e-tron vs Ford Ranger vs Toyota Camry. Toyota Camry offers the strongest value on price. Audi Q6 e-tron leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Overall Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron
Best Value
Toyota Camry
Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
Performance
Audi Q6 e-tron
Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Audi Q6 e-tron
$64,900 – $65,900
Rating: 4.8/10
Ford Ranger
$42,500 – $43,200
Rating: 4.6/10
Toyota Camry
$36,795
Rating: 4.8/10
| Specification |
Audi Q6 e-tron |
Ford Ranger |
Toyota Camry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Audi | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Q6 e-tron | Ranger | Camry |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | Ev | — | — |
| Body Style | SUV | Pickup Truck | Sedan |
| Current Price | $64,900 – $65,900 | $42,500 – $43,200 | $36,795 |
| MSRP | $65,900 | $43,200 | $36,795 |
| Dealer Price | $63,900 | $41,900 | $35,995 |
| Engine | Dual Motor quattro | 2.3L EcoBoost I4 Turbo | 2.5L Hybrid I4 |
| Horsepower | 422 hp (with launch control) | 270 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 580 Nm | 310 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft |
| 0–60 mph | 5.0 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.5 sec (0-60 mph) | 6.8 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 112 mph | 112 mph |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 17.0 - 15.8 kWh/100 km (WLTP) | 22 mpg combined | 46 mpg combined |
| Range (EV) | 388 miles WLTP (up to 300 miles EPA) | — | N/A |
| Emissions | 0 g/km | EPA compliant | Low |
| Battery | 100 kWh gross | — | Lithium-ion |
| Charging | 270 kW DC (10-80% in 21 min) | — | Self-charging hybrid |
| Expert Rating | 4.8/10 | 4.6/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Community Reviews | 0 | 1120 | 0 |
| Performance Score | 9.0 | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Comfort Score | 9.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Safety Score | Audi pre sense | 9.2 | 3.0 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 9.2 | 9.5 | 46 mpg combined |
| Technology Score | 9.6 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Pros | Blazing-fast 270 kW DC charging with 800V tech; Exceptional interior build quality and OLED displays; Smooth ride and re... | Ultra-fast 800V DC charging; Distinctive retro-futuristic design; Spacious lounge-style interior; Strong standard safety... | Excellent fuel economy; Standard hybrid powertrain; Comfortable ride; High reliability; Strong safety features |
| Cons | High starting price in luxury segment; Touch-heavy interior controls require adaptation; Slightly smaller cargo space th... | Ride can feel floaty on some roads; No frunk on all trims; Infotainment learning curve for some users; Real-world highwa... | No V6 option; Conservative styling; Limited sporty feel; Rear headroom slightly reduced |
