Subaru Forester vs Toyota RAV4
AI Comparison Summary
Comparing Subaru Forester vs Toyota RAV4. Subaru Forester offers the strongest value on price. Subaru Forester leads on expert rating.
Category Winners
Toyota RAV4
4.7/10Visual Comparison
Category Radar
Price & Reviews
Model Year
Expert Rating
Subaru Forester
$34,795
Toyota RAV4
$35,699 – $36,450| Specification |
Subaru Forester |
Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Subaru | Toyota |
| Model | Forester | RAV4 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | — | — |
| Body Style | Compact Crossover SUV | Compact Crossover SUV |
| Current Price | $34,795 | $35,699 – $36,450 |
| MSRP | $34,795 | $36,450 |
| Dealer Price | $33,600 | $35,199 |
| Engine | 2.5L Direct-Injection SUBARU BOXER 4-Cylinder | 2.5L Hybrid System |
| Horsepower | 180 hp | 236 hp (AWD net combined) |
| Torque | 178 lb-ft | Hybrid system output (manufacturer managed) |
| 0–60 mph | 8.0 sec (0-60 mph) | Approx. 7.0 sec (0-60 mph) |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | Approx. 115 mph |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Hybrid |
| Mileage / MPG | 28 MPG Combined (25 City / 32 Hwy) | 40 MPG combined (AWD hybrid est.) |
| Range (EV) | N/A | N/A |
| Emissions | LEV3-SULEV30 Certified | ULEV/SULEV compliant (market dependent) |
| Battery | N/A | Lithium-ion hybrid battery |
| Charging | N/A | Self-charging hybrid (regenerative + engine) |
| Expert Rating | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Community Reviews | 142 | 1720 |
| Performance Score | 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Comfort Score | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Safety Score | EyeSight Driver Assist Technology | 9.4 |
| Fuel Economy Score | 25 mpg | 9.5 |
| Technology Score | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Value Score | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Pros | Distinctive 19-inch bronze-finished alloy wheels and dark bronze exterior styling accents; Water-repellent StarTex seati... | Excellent hybrid fuel economy; Strong reliability and resale reputation; Comprehensive standard safety features; Practic... |
| Cons | Naturally aspirated 180 hp 2.5L engine offers adequate rather than exhilarating acceleration; 1,500 lb towing capacity i... | Ride can feel firm on rough roads; Interior design is functional rather than luxurious; Higher trims increase cost quick... |